Court of Appeal - 2022

63 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
63 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
May 2022
SUMMARY Practice – Appeal - Rule 52 of the High Court Rules 1980 – The appeal should have been set down within four weeks - appeal is dismissed with costs.
13 May 2022
13 May 2022
Summary An appeal against the part of a judgment dealing with the quantum of damages, cannot be properly heard without a fully transcribed record of the proceedings before the lower court. This is especially so because the appellant relies on oral evidence, not reflected in the record. The appeal is struck off the record.
13 May 2022
SUMMARY High Court convicted appellants of assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm where victim of assault died as a result of injuries from the assault; Court sentenced each appellant to fifteen years imprisonment; Appellants initially appealed against sentence only; After Crown cross-appealed against verdict and asked Court to find appellants guilty of murder, appellants then appealed against conviction and sought acquittal of appellants; Held the proper verdict was murder with constructive intent founded on the doctrine of common purpose; verdict accordingly altered; Extenuating circumstances found to exist and after considering mitigating factors sentence reduced from fifteen years to ten years for each of the appellant
13 May 2022
SUMMARY A plaintiff may apply for summary judgment in terms of Rule 28 of the Rules of Court after the filing of a plea by the defendant. A vague allegation that the amount of interest accumulated by an outstanding debt does not constitute a bona fide defence under Rule 28.
13 May 2022
Summary A public officer challenging a decision dismissing him by way of review in the High Court. Court of Appeal restating that such complaints must be pursued under the grievance procedure in the Public Service Act 2005.
13 May 2022
Summary The Government of Lesotho’s (GoL) failure, amongst others, to comply with Reg.32(1) of the Public Service Regulations 2008 requiring the principal secretary of the Public Service to consult receiving ministries when a transfer of a public officer is contemplated was held by the High Court to be unlawful and therefore reviewed and set aside. On appeal the GoL argued that the regulation was not mandatory in every case and that the High Court erred in so concluding. Held on appeal that the High Court did not err, and the appeal dismissed with costs.
13 May 2022
Summary: The appellant challenged his transfer in the High Court. Without any answering affidavit having been filed and without hearing submissions by counsel, the Court refused the application. No proper reasons for the order were furnished. The appeal cannot proceed meaningfully, or at all. The matter is remitted back to the High Court.
13 May 2022
SUMMARY: Jurisdiction— under rule 84 of land court rules, the land court has jurisdiction to review its own decision—a litigant, with proven interest may apply to the same court for review under grounds stated in rule 85 and the court may vary or reverse its earlier decision- appellant having established acceptable grounds of review, appeal allowed.
13 May 2022
SUMMARY Practice - Judgments and orders - Summary judgment — Appeal against granting of — Court hearing application for summary judgment should be slow to defeat purpose of summary judgment procedure by granting rescission, where satisfied that defendant has no bona fide defence. Summary judgment — Liquidated amount — Appeal against granting of — Court hearing application for summary judgment should be slow to defeat purpose of summary judgment procedure by granting leave to appeal, where satisfied that defendant has no bona fide defence.
13 May 2022
SUMMARY Administrative law – Jurisdiction -Review of administrative act -Application for review of a decision of the Minister of Trade and Industry not to renew the contract of the Chief Executive Officer of the Lesotho National Development Corporation
13 May 2022
SUMMARY Ambassador of Lesotho to Italy remaining in Rome for a month after his tour of duty and tenure came to an end; Ambassador claiming he was entitled to salary for the one month on grounds that he carried on duties as ambassador during that month; Ministry contesting that he performed any duty as ambassador and his contract of engagement having come to an end he was not entitled to any salary; Ambassador failing to prove that he did any work and therefore entitled to salary; High Court having dismissed his application with costs, on appeal, Held appeal should be dismissed; On costs order of High Court set aside and substituted with one ordering each party to bear its own cost; Each party also ordered to bear its costs of appeal
13 May 2022
April 2022
21 April 2022