Civil Procedure – Urgent Applications – Interim Custody of Disputed Property –

Ownership and Possession – Rei Vindicatio and Spoliation – Suspension of

Execution Pending Appeal – Peregrinus and Security for Costs – Jurisdiction

and Lis Pendens – Principles of Urgent Relief.

Civil Procedure – Exception – Appealability – Dismissal of exception – Whether

appealable without leave – Distinction between interlocutory and final orders –

Principles governing appealability – Fraud alleged in pleadings – Exception not2

determinative of factual disputes – Duty of appellate court to respect trial court’s

process – Piecemeal appeals discouraged.

Family law – Custody of children – Best interests of the child – Paramountcy principle – Litigation delays and procedural irregularities – Appeal struck off by consent owing to defective and confused record – Duty of practitioners to conduct custody litigation with diligence and clarity.
Procedure – Appeals – Leave to appeal – Defective and incomplete record – Confusion as to judgment appealed against – Grounds of appeal unrelated to impugned order – Effect of sloppy litigation on administration of justice.
Practice and conduct – Role of lawyers and adjudicators – The best interests of the child as a guiding principle – Paramountcy of children’s welfare does not excuse procedural negligence – Importance of disciplined, responsible and coherent advocacy in family disputes.

Administrative Law — Review — Delay in institution of proceedings — Unreasonable delay — Effect — Continuing cause of action — Distinction between gratuity and pension — Gratuity payable once-off and does not give rise to a continuing cause of action — Pension payable periodically and giving rise to a new cause of action each month when short-paid — Review dismissed
for unreasonable delay in respect of gratuity but allowed regarding pension — Matter remitted to High Court.

Appeal — Punitive Costs — Misjoinder — Audi Alteram Partem — Judicial Discretion — Appellate Intervention

Civil Procedure – Rescission of default judgment – Failure to enter appearance to defend – Rule 27 (old Rules) and Rule 45 of the High Court Rules 1980 distinguished – Requirement of formal condonation application for delay – Misguided refusal by court a quo to consider “good cause” under Rule 27(6)(c) – Judicial discretion to rescind – Court of Appeal’s power to interfere where discretion not properly exercised – Distinction between authority to sue and validity of power of attorney emphasized – Resolution to litigate not equivalent to proper authorization to act – Default judgment rescinded and matter remitted to High Court for hearing on the merits.

Constitutional and Administrative Law — Compensation for deprivation of property — Lesotho Highlands Water Project — Statutory obligation of Lesotho
2
Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) to compensate affected communities — Whether LHDA could rely on In-Stream Flow Requirement (IFR) Policy to deny payment — Failure to consult affected communities — Rule of law and administrative fairness — Duty arising ex lege, not ex consensu.

Constitutional Law – Jurisdiction of the High Court – Enforcement of fundamental rights under section 19 of the Constitution – Proper procedure under section 22 of the Constitution and the Constitutional Litigation Rules –
2
Distinction between ordinary and constitutional jurisdiction – Application brought as an ordinary civil claim instead of under section 22 – Non-compliance with constitutional procedure rendering proceedings a nullity – Matter to commence de novo before the High Court exercising its constitutional jurisdiction – Principle against bifurcation of proceedings reaffirmed.

Public Service — Diplomacy — Recall of Consul General — Absence of Exequatur — Whether renders appointment void — Legitimate expectation — Termination clause — Administrative fairness — Rationality — Government’s
2
omission — International and domestic law interface — Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963) — Articles 12, 22, and 36 — Contractual and administrative legality.

Constitutional and Administrative Law — Jurisdiction — Foreign States and International Organisations — Sovereign Immunity — Whether Courts of Lesotho have jurisdiction to make orders against foreign governments or international bodies — Distinction between jurisdiction over foreign entities and domestic authorities — Allegations of threats to personal liberty and safety — Duty of courts to safeguard constitutional rights within Lesotho’s territory notwithstanding foreign involvement.