|
Application to interdict respondent from denying applicant use of regular passport and to review and set aside the declaration of the passport as null and void to be irregular, unconstitutional and unlawful – whether applicant was entitled to a hearing before the decision was made – whether applicant established he has a right to the passport – whether respondents were correct to deny applicant re-entry into Lesotho – issuance of passport to applicant illegal and cannot be sanctioned - applicant not entitled to the audi alteram partem before the decision was taken – respondents’ decision to deny applicant re-entry unlawful
|
|
Judgment |
13 February 2013 |