Human Rights

10 documents
Human Rights
  • Filters
  • Years
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
10 documents
Title
Date

Constitutional Law – Jurisdiction of the High Court – Enforcement of fundamental rights under section 19 of the Constitution – Proper procedure under section 22 of the Constitution and the Constitutional Litigation Rules –
2
Distinction between ordinary and constitutional jurisdiction – Application brought as an ordinary civil claim instead of under section 22 – Non-compliance with constitutional procedure rendering proceedings a nullity – Matter to commence de novo before the High Court exercising its constitutional jurisdiction – Principle against bifurcation of proceedings reaffirmed.

Judgment 7 November 2025

Revenue law – Jurisdiction – High Court vs specialised tax tribunal – “Pay now,

argue later” – Ouster or deferment of jurisdiction – Interdict to suspend tax

payment – RAT Act 2005 – Income Tax Act 1993 – Condonation – Leave to

appeal – Final vs interlocutory.

Judgment 7 November 2025

Constitutional Law — Locus Standi — Direct and Personal Interest — Section 22(1) of the Constitution of Lesotho.

Judgment 7 November 2025

FLYNOTE
Education Law — Appointment of school principal — Teaching Service Commission — Discretion to appoint from recommended candidates — Whether School Board’s ranking creates enforceable legitimate expectation — Procedural fairness — Rationality — Education Act 2010, s 42.

Judgment 2 May 2025
Judgment 2 May 2025
Judgment 18 March 2025
Judgment 10 February 2025
Judgment 6 February 2025
Judgment 20 June 2023

Application to interdict respondent from denying applicant use of regular passport and to review and set aside the declaration of the passport as null and void to be irregular, unconstitutional and unlawful – whether applicant was entitled to a hearing before the decision was made – whether applicant established he has a right to the passport – whether respondents were correct to deny applicant re-entry into Lesotho – issuance of passport to applicant illegal and cannot be
sanctioned - applicant not entitled to the audi alteram partem before the decision was taken – respondents’ decision to deny applicant re-entry unlawful.

Judgment 13 February 2013