|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
Judgment |
31 March 2026 |
|
FLYNOTE Administrative Law — Judicial review — Diplomatic service — Irrational and unequal treatment — Failure to convert salaries of South African-based diplomats into United States dollars while doing so for other missions — Whether exclusion rational and legally defensible — Reviewability of executive policy — High Court’s failure to address substantive review grounds — Serious misdirection. Prescription — Government Proceedings and Contracts Act 1965, s 6 — Whether applicable to review proceedings — Requirement that prescription be specifically pleaded and proved — Onus on the party alleging it — Court may not raise prescription mero motu. Contract — Incorporation of terms — Requirement of notice and intention to be contractually binding — Exclusionary savingram not forming part of contracts of service — No evidence that appellants were aware of or consented to it
|
|
Judgment |
7 November 2025 |
|
Administrative law – National Security Service – Lawful discharge – Principle against self-help – Collateral challenge – Jurisdiction of High Court – Rule of law and state security
|
|
Judgment |
7 November 2025 |
|
Public Service — Diplomacy — Recall of Consul General — Absence of Exequatur — Whether renders appointment void — Legitimate expectation — Termination clause — Administrative fairness — Rationality — Government’s 2 omission — International and domestic law interface — Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963) — Articles 12, 22, and 36 — Contractual and administrative legality
|
|
Judgment |
7 November 2025 |
|
Administrative Law — Public Service — Study leave as prerequisite for state sponsorship — Loan Bursary Agreement — Withdrawal from study leave — Whether withdrawal from study leave automatically terminates bursary agreement — Whether NMDS obliged to continue sponsorship notwithstanding return to duty — Good cause for revocation
|
|
Judgment |
7 November 2025 |
|
Administrative Law — Legitimate Expectation — Job Evaluation and Grading — Public Service Commission’s Decision to Grade Judicial Officers — Whether Central and Local Court Presidents had Legitimate Expectation to be Placed at Grades I and H Respectively — Unsigned Answering Affidavit — Effect — Jurisdiction of High Court
|
|
Judgment |
7 November 2025 |
|
|
|
Judgment |
6 August 2025 |
|
|
|
Judgment |
14 March 2025 |
|
|
|
Judgment |
13 September 2024 |
|
|
|
Judgment |
9 May 1984 |