S v Lepeli,S v Mosuoe and Another,S v Makoae,S v Tau and Others,S v Molapo,D.P.P. v Lethunya,S v Bereng and Another ((CRI) 1 of 1985; (CRI) 1 of 1986; (CRI) 1 of 1987; (CRI) 2 of 1986; (CRI) 3 of 1988; (CRI) 5 of 1986; (CRI) 9 of 1988) [1990] LSCA 7 (22 January 1990)


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LESOTHO
In Sundry Matters Called on 22 January, 1990

Held at Maseru

Coram: Schutz. P.

Plewman, J.A. Ackermann, J.A.

Schutz P.

ORDERS

The matters in which orders need to be made will now be dealt with, and the forms of orders in those cases are set out below.

1. (CRI) 1 of 1985 T. Lepeli v Rex

(a) The Director of Pulbic Prosecutions is to

report on whether the appellant wishes to proceed with his appeal.

  1. If he does the appellant is to bring a
    condonation application which will be
    set down together with the appeal.

  2. If the tapes for preparing a record are
    not available a record is to be prepared

/in accordance ...

- 2 -

in accordance with the principles set out in Phasumane and Others v Rex F. of A. (CRI) 2 of 1985.

  1. The record is to be prepared by 11 May
    1990.

  2. If the appellant is not able to afford
    a record the Registrar is to waive the
    prescribed fee provided for in C. of
    A. Rule 3(10).

  3. If the appellant requires the services
    of pro deo counsel, the Registrar to
    appoint one.

  4. The Registrar is to determine by enquiry
    of the appellant whether or not the relief
    sought in (e) and (f) is required and is

to make the appropriate appointment by 15 May 1990.

2. (CRI) 1 OF 1986 Lesole Mashaile, Thabo Mosuoe

and Mosuoe Mosuoe v Rex

(a) If the tapes for preparing a record are not available a record is to be prepared in accordance with the principles set out in Phasumane and Others v Rex C. of A. (CRI) 2 of 1985.

/(b) ...

- 3 -

  1. The Record is to be prepared by 11 May 1990.

  2. If the appellant is not able to afford a
    record the Registrar is to waive the
    prescribed fee provided for in C. of A.
    3(10).

  3. If the appellant required the services of
    pro deo counsel, the Registrar is to
    appoint one.

  4. The Registrar is to determine by enquiry
    of the appellant whether or not the relief
    sought in 2(c) and (d) is required and is
    to make the appropriate appointment by 15
    May 1990.

3. (CRI) 2 of 1986 Motlomelo Makoae v Rex

  1. If the tapes for preparing a record are
    not available a record is to be prepared
    in accordance with the principles set out
    in Phasumane and Others v Rex C. of A.
    (CRI) 2 of 1985.

  2. The record is to be prepared by 11 May
    1990.

  1. If the appellant is not able to afford

/a record ...

- 4 -

a record the Registrar is to waive the prescribed fee provided for in C. of A. Rule 3(10).

  1. If the appellant requires the services of
    pro deo counsel, the Registrar is to
    appoint one.

  2. The Registrar is to determine by enquiry
    of the appellant whether or not the
    relief sought in (c) and (d) is required
    and to make the appropriate appointment by
    15 May 1990.

4. (CRI) 5 of 1986 M. Mabope, Makhetha, Mojalefa
Mpota and Sempe Tau v Rex

  1. The four appellants are to be supplied
    with records for which they have already
    paid.

  2. The record is to be prepared by 11 May
    1990.

5. (CRI) 1 of 1987 Matlaselo Molapo v Rex

(a) The record is to be prepared by 11 May 1990.

/If the ...

- 5 -

(b) If the appellant is not able to afford a record the Registrar is to waive the prescribed fee provided for in C. of A. Rule 3(10).

6. (CRI) 3 of 1988 D,P.P. v Lesesa Lethunya

(a) If the tapes for preparing a record are
not available a record is to be prepared
in accordance with the principles set

out in Phasumane and Others v Rex C. of A. (CRI) 2 of 1985.

  1. If the appellant is not able to afford
    a record the Registrar is to waive the
    prescribed fee provided for in C. of A.
    Rule 3(10).

  2. The Registrar is to report on the state
    of the record on 15 May 1990 unless it
    has been prepared by then.

9. (CRI) 9 of 1988 Reentseng Bereng and Another v Rex

(a) If the tapes for preparing a record are not available a record is to be prepared in accordance with the principles set out in Phasumane and Others v Rex C. of A. (CRI) 2 of 1985.

/(b) If the ...

- 6 -

  1. If the appellant is not able to afford
    a record the Registrar is to waive the
    prescribed fee provided for in C. of A.
    Rule 3(10).

  2. The Registrar is to report on the state
    of the record on 15 May 1990 unless it

has been prepared by then.

10. General

The date of the next session, and the names of the cases to be set down at it will be decided by the

President.

Signed

W. P. Schutz

PRESIDENT

I agree Signed:

C. Plewman
JUDGE OF APPEAL

I agree Signed:

L. W. H. Ackermann
JUDGE OF APPEAL

Delivered at MASERU this day of January, 1990.

For the Crown : Mr. S. Mdhluli
For appellants, or respondents

In D.P.P. appeals : Multiple as also persons

in person.

▲ To the top