Lesotho
High Court Act, 1978
Act 5 of 1978
- Published in Government Gazette
- Assented to on 8 August 1978
- Commenced on 18 August 1978
- [This is the version of this document from 18 August 1978.]
1. Short title
This Act may be cited as the High Court Act 1978.2. Continuation of existence of High Court
3. Appointment of Judges of High Court
4. Tenure of office of High Court
5. Registrar of High Court
6. High Court proceedings when within subordinate courts’ jurisdiction
No civil cause or action within the jurisdiction of a subordinate court (which expression includes a local or central court) shall be instituted in or removed into the High Court, save—7. Powers of review
8. Powers on appeal
9. Assessors
10. Place of sittings
The High Court shall hold its sittings in the High Court building at Maseru or in such other place as the Chief Justice may appoint.11. Sessions of Court
12. Distribution of business
The Chief Justice shall regulate the distribution of business in the court, and all actions and proceedings before the Court shall be heard and determined by a single judge, unless the Chief Justice otherwise directs.13. Proceedings to be in open Court
Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the pleadings and proceedings of the High Court shall be carried on and the sentences, decrees, judgments and orders thereof pronounced and declared in open court, but a judge may, if he thinks fit and at any time of the proceedings, order the court to be cleared or order any person or class of persons to leave the court.14. No Judge to hold other office of profit
15. Gratuities, allowance & privileges of judges
16. Rules of Court
The Chief Justice may make rules of court for any one or more of the following purposes—17. Repeal
The High Court Act 1967 and Part 3 of the Court of Appeal and High Court Order 1970 are repealed.History of this document
18 August 1978 this version
Commenced
08 August 1978
Assented to
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 64
Judgment
61|
SUMMARY
Procedure – matter not finally disposed of not res judicata – following the rule that proceedings have to be interpreted if conducted in a language other than English would be too strictly following the rules of procedure in the Small Claims Court.
|
|
Summary
Concurrency of jurisdiction - Rule 9(2) of the Land Court Rules of 2012 -whether the decision of the Court of Appeal in Moletsane v Thamae removes adherence to the requirements of this rule - this Court holds that it does not - objects of the Land Act 2010 in creating the District Land Courts as well as prior decisions of the Court of Appeal on the interpretation of section 6 of the High Court Act of 1978 discussed and applied - jurisdiction declined.
|
|
SUMMARY
Review of criminal proceedings of a Magistrate Court – Application not opposed – Failure by a magistrate to use a sworn interpreter in recording Sesotho proceedings in English - Failure by a magistrate to advice applicant of seriousness of the offence and possible penalty – Failure by a magistrate to advise applicant of the right to legal representation on date of trial – Applicant informed of the right to legal representation and the right to legal aid counsel upon arraignment– No allegation of prejudice or miscarriage of justice – Application dismissed.
|
Legal Notice
1Subsidiary legislation
|
Title
|
|
|---|---|
| Legal Notice 159 of 2011 | |
| Legal Notice 9 of 1980 |