Court of Appeal Act, 1978

Jurisdiction
Lesotho
Citation
Act 10 of 1978
Date
15 September 1978
Language
English
Type
Legislation
Download
Download PDF (210.5 KB)
Lesotho

Court of Appeal Act, 1978

Act 10 of 1978

  • Published in Government Gazette
  • Assented to on 6 September 1978
  • Commenced on 15 September 1978
  • [This is the version of this document from 15 September 1978.]
ACTTo consolidate and amend the law relating to the Court of Appeal.Enacted by the Assembly—

1. Short title

This Act may be cited as the Court of Appeal Act 1978.

2. Interpretation

In this Act—"the Court" means the Court of Appeal;"judgment" means decree, order, conviction, sentence and decision.

Part I – Constitution of Court

3. Continuation of existence of Court of Appeal

(1)The Court of Appeal for Lesotho shall continue to exist and shall have such jurisdiction and powers as are conferred on it by this Act or any other law.
(2)The judges of the Court shall be—
(a)the President;
(b)four Justices of Appeal;
(c)the Chief Justice and judges of the High Court ex officio.
(3)The Court shall hold its sittings in the High Court building at Maseru or in such other place as the President may appoint.

4. Appointment of Judges of Court of Appeal

(1)The President and Justices of Appeal shall be appointed by the King acting in accordance with the advice of the Prime Minister.
(2)A person shall not be qualified to be appointed as the President or as Justice of Appeal unless—
(a)he holds or has held office as a judge of a court having unlimited jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters in some part of the Commonwealth or in the Republic of South Africa or of a court having jurisdiction in appeals from such a court;
(b)holds the qualifications required for admission and enrolment by the High Court as advocate or attorney under the Legal Practitioners Act 1967 and has held the same for a period of not less than seven years.
(3)If the office of President is vacant or the President is for any reason unable to exercise the functions of his office, then until a person has been appointed to and has assumed the functions of that office or until the President has resumed his functions, as the case may be, they shall be exercised by such one of the judges of the Court or by such other person qualified to be appointed as a judge of the Court as the Prime Minister may appoint.
(4)If the office of a Justice of Appeal is vacant or if a Justice of Appeal is appointed to act as President or is for any reason unable to perform the functions of his office or if the President advises the Prime Minister that the state of business so requires, the Prime Minister may appoint a person who is qualified to be appointed as a Justice of Appeal to act as a Justice of Appeal.
(5)A person appointed under subsection (4) to act as a Justice of Appeal shall subject to section 5(1) and 5(3), continue to act for the period of his appointment, or if no such period is specified, until his appointment is revoked by the Prime Minister.
(6)A person appointed to act as President or as a Justice of Appeal in pursuance of subsection (3) or (4) may, notwithstanding the assumption or resumption of duties by the President in the first case, or the expiration of the period, or the revocation, of the appointment in the second case, continue to act as President or Justice of Appeal for so long and to such extent as may be necessary to enable him to deliver judgment or to do any other thing in relation to proceedings which were commenced previously thereto.

5. Tenure of office of Judges of Court of Appeal

(1)Subject to this section, a person holding the office of President or Justice of Appeal shall vacate the office when he attains the age of 75 years.
(2)Notwithstanding that he has attained the age prescribed in subsection (1), a President or Justice of Appeal may continue in office for so long after attaining the age as may be necessary to enable him to deliver judgment or to do any other thing in relation to proceedings commenced before him before he attained that age.
(3)A President or Justice of Appeal may be removed from office by the King acting on the advice of the Prime Minister but only for inability to perform the functions of his office (whether arising from infirmity of body or mind or any other cause) or for misbehaviour.
(4)Notwithstanding subsection (1) and whenever it is expedient to do so the Prime Minister may
(a)appoint any person who is over 75 years but otherwise qualified to be appointed to act as a Justice of Appeal;
(b)extend the appointment of the President or of a Justice of Appeal who has attained the age of 75 years,
for such period or further period as the Prime Minister may think fit, and in such cases, the reference in subsection (2) to the age prescribed in subsection (1) shall be construed as a reference to the date of termination of the appointment or of the extension or further extension of the appointment as the case may be.

6. Composition of Court of Appeal

The Court shall, when determining any matter other than an interlocutory matter, be composed of an uneven number of judges, not being less than three.

Part II – Criminal appeals

7. First appeals

(1)Any person convicted on a trial by the High Court may appeal to the Court on any matter of fact as well as on any matter of law.
(2)If the Director of Public Prosecutions is dissatisfied with any judgment of the High Court upon a point of law in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, he may appeal against such judgment to the Court.
(3)A sentence passed by the High Court on a person committed to the High Court for sentence shall be deemed to be a sentence passed upon such person on a trial held by the High Court and an appeal against such sentence shall lie accordingly to the Court.

8. Second appeals

(1)Any party to an appeal to the High Court may appeal to the Court against the High Court judgment with the leave of the judge of the High Court, or, when such leave is refused, with the leave of the Court on any ground of appeal which involves a question of law but not on a question of fact nor against severity of sentence.
(2)For the purposes of this section an order made by the High Court in its revisional jurisdiction, or a decision of the High Court on a case stated, shall be deemed to be a decision of the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction.

9. Determination of appeal in ordinary cases

(1)Subject to subsection (2) on an appeal against conviction the Court shall allow the appeal if it is of the opinion that the conviction should be set aside on the ground that it is unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the evidence, or on the ground of any wrong decision of any question of law, or that on any other ground there was a miscarriage of justice, and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal.
(2)Notwithstanding the fact that the Court is of opinion that the point raised in an appeal under subsection (1) might be decided in favour of the appellant, the Court may, if it considers that no substantial miscarriage of justice has actually occurred, dismiss the appeal.
(3)The Court shall, if it allows an appeal against the conviction, either quash the conviction and direct a judgment and verdict of acquittal to be entered or if the interests of justice so require, order a new trial.
(4)On an appeal against sentence, the Court shall, if it thinks that a different sentence should have been passed, quash the sentence passed at the trial and pass such other sentence warranted in law (whether more or less severe) in substitution therefor as it thinks ought to have been passed, and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal.

10. Powers of Court in special cases

(1)If it appears to the Court that an appellant though not properly convicted on some count of the indictment or charge, has been properly convicted on some other count of the indictment or charge, the Court may either confirm the sentence passed on the appellant at the trial or pass such sentence in substitution therefor as it thinks proper and as may be warranted in law on the count of the indictment or charge on which the Court considers that the appellant has been properly convicted.
(2)Where an appellant has been convicted of an offence and the trial court could on the indictment or charge have found him guilty of some other offence and on the finding of the trial court must have been satisfied of the facts which proved him guilty of that other offence, the Court may, instead of allowing or dismissing the appeal, substitute for the judgment of the trial court a judgment of guilty of that other offence and pass such sentence in substitution for the sentence passed at the trial as may be warranted in law for that other offence, not being a sentence of greater severity.
(3)If on any appeal it appears to the Court that, although the appellant was guilty of the act or omission charged against him, he was insane at the time the act was done or the omission made so as not to be responsible for his actions, the Court may quash the sentence passed at the trial and substitute therefor a finding to the effect that the appellant was guilty of the act or omission charged against him but was insane at the time when he did the act or made the omission, and shall thereupon order that the appellant be kept in custody in some prison pending the signification of the King’s pleasure.

11. Powers of the Court in relation to an order ancillary to conviction

Where the operation of any award or order of restitution or revesting of property and of any other award or order which is an award or order ancillary to conviction is suspended pending the determination of an appeal to the Court, the Court may by order annul or vary any such award or order although the conviction is not quashed and shall annul the award or order, if the conviction is quashed and the award or order if annulled, shall not take effect, and, if varied, shall take effect as so varied.

12. Supplementary powers of Court

The Court may, if it thinks it necessary or expedient in the interests of justice—
(a)order the production of any document, exhibit, or other thing connected with the proceedings, the production of which appears to it necessary for the determination of the case;
(b)order any witness who would have been a compellable witness at the trial to attend and be examined before the Court whether he was or was not called at the trial, or order the examination of any such witness before any Judge of the Court or other person appointed by the Court for the purpose, and allow the admission of any deposition so taken as evidence before the Court;
(c)receive the evidence, if tendered, of any witness (including the appellant) who is a competent but not compellable witness, and, if the appellant makes an application for the purpose, of the husband or wife of the appellant, in cases where the evidence of the husband or wife could not have been given at the trial except on such application to the trial court,
but in no case shall a sentence be increased by reason of or in consideration of any evidence which was not given at the trial.

13. Stay of execution of sentence of death or corporal punishment

In the case of a sentence of death or of corporal punishment—
(a)the sentence shall not be executed until after the expiration of the time within which a notice of appeal or an application for leave to appeal may be given;
(b)if a notice of appeal is filed the sentence shall not be executed until the appeal has been determined or abandoned;
(c)if an application for leave to appeal is filed, the application shall be determined as soon as practicable and the sentence shall not be executed until the application has been refused or the appeal has been determined or abandoned.

14. Power to admit to bail and postpone fine

(1)The Court or the High Court may, if it deems fit, on the application of an appellant and pending the determination of his appeal—
(a)admit the appellant to bail; and
(b)postpone the payment of any fine imposed upon him.
(2)The time during which an appellant, pending the determination of his appeal, is admitted to bail shall not count as part of any term of imprisonment under his sentence.
(3)Any imprisonment under the sentence of the appellant, whether it is the sentence passed by the court of trial or the sentence passed by the Court shall, subject to any directions which the Court may give to the contrary, be deemed to be resumed or to begin to run, as the case requires—
(a)if the appellant is in custody, as from the day on which his appeal is determined;
(b)if the appellant is not in custody as from the day on which he is received into gaol under the sentence.
(4)When an appellant has been released on bail the court which released him may, if satisfied that it is in the interests of justice so to do, revoke the order admitting to bail, issue a warrant for his apprehension and order him to be committed to prison.

15. Case stated

(1)In addition and without prejudice to the right of appeal given by this or any other Act, a Judge of the High Court may, upon the determination of a conviction whether in its original or appellate criminal jurisdiction, reserve any question of law arising therein for the consideration of the court.
(2)The Court shall determine any question reserved for its consideration under subsection (1).
(3)On the determination by the Court of a question reserved for its consideration under subsection (1), the Court may make an order confirming, or setting aside the decision of the High Court, and shall have the same powers in relation to a case stated by the High Court as it has in relation to an appeal.

Part III – Civil appeals

16. Right of appeal in civil cases

(1)An appeal shall lie to the Court—
(a)from all final judgments of the High Court;
(b)by leave of the Court from an interlocutory order, an order made ex parte or an order as to costs only.
(2)The rights of appeal given by subsection (1) shall apply only to judgments given in the exercise of the original jurisdiction of the High Court.

17. Right of appeal from decision of High Court in its civil appellate jurisdiction

Any person aggrieved by any judgment of the High Court in its civil appellate jurisdiction may appeal to the Court with the leave of the Court or upon the certificate of the Judge who heard the appeal on any ground of appeal which involves a question of law but not on a question of fact.

18. Appeal in special cases

An appeal shall lie to the Court where provision is expressly made in any Act for such an appeal.

19. Power to reserve questions of law for opinion of Court of Appeal

In addition and without prejudice to the right of appeal given by this or any other Act, a Judge of the High Court may reserve for consideration by the Court, on a case to be stated by him, any question of law which may arise on the trial of any suit or matter and may give any judgment subject to the opinion of the Court, and the Court shall have power to hear and determine every such question.

Part IV – General

20. No appeal from Court of Appeal

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any other law there shall be no appeal from any judgment of the Court.

21. Prerogative of mercy

In the exercise of His prerogative of mercy, the King may, on consideration of any petition for the exercise of His mercy, having reference to the conviction of a person by the High Court or to the sentence (other than sentence of death) passed on a person so convicted or, in the case of a person sentenced to death, on consideration of the record of the trial, either—
(a)refer the whole case to the Court and the case shall then be heard and determined by the Court as in the case of an appeal by a convicted person; or
(b)if He desires the assistance of the Court on any point arising in the case, refer the point to the Court for their opinion thereon, and the Court shall consider the point so referred and furnish the King with its opinion thereupon accordingly.

22. Rules of Court

The President may make rules of court for any one or more of the following purposes—
(a)regulating the practice and procedure of the Court in all matters before it;
(b)prescribing the time within which any requirement of the rules is to be complied with;
(c)prescribing the fees to be taken in the Court; the costs of, and incidental, to any proceedings in the Court; and providing for the taxation and recovery of the same;
(d)regarding any other matter which appears to the President to be necessary and desirable.

23. Repeals

The Court of Appeal Proclamation 1954 and Parts 1, 2 and 4 of the Court of Appeal and High Court Order 1970 are repealed.[order 17 of 1970]
▲ To the top

History of this document

15 September 1978 this version
Commenced
06 September 1978
Assented to

Cited documents 0

Documents citing this one 46

Judgment 45
  1. (C of A (CRI) 4 of 1980) [1981] LSCA 45 (3 July 1981)
  2. (C of A (CRI) 5 of 1979; C of A (CRI) 6 of 1979) [1981] LSCA 3 (12 January 1981)
  3. (C of A (CRI) 5 of 1981) [1981] LSCA 44 (30 June 1981)
  4. BP Lesotho (Pty) Ltd v Moloi and Another (C of A (CIV) 1 of 2006) [2006] LSCA 3 (11 April 2006)
  5. Capricons Consultants (Pty) Ltd v Butt Motors & Parts (Pty) Ltd (C of A (CIV) 39 of 2015) [2016] LSCA 7 (29 April 2016)
  6. Chaba-li-maketse Society v Sibeko (C of A (CIV) 50 of 2018) [2019] LSCA 26 (31 May 2019)
  7. Chen Yun Bo v Paballo Martin Theko and Others (C of A (CIV) 7 of 2014) [2014] LSCA 3 (17 April 2014)
  8. Chen Yun Bo v Paballo Martin Theko and Others (LAC/REV 8 of 13) [2014] LSLAC 1 (27 January 2014)
  9. Commander Lesotho Defence Force and Others v Mareka (C of A (CIV) 27 of 15) [2015] LSCA 23 (7 August 2015)
  10. Director General National Security Service v Lietsiso Mothala & Others (C of A (CIV) 31 of 2019) [2019] LSCA 43 (1 November 2019)
  11. Directorate on Corruption and Economic Affairs and Others v Dlamini (CIV/APN/297/2008; C OF A (CIV) 21/2009) [2009] LSCA 10 (23 October 2009)
  12. Fako v The Director of Public Prosecution (CRI/T 4 of 18) [2020] LSHC 20 (29 January 2020)
  13. First National Bank of Lesotho Limited v Lugy's Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (C of A (CIV) 51 of 2019) [2019] LSCA 33 (11 November 2019)
  14. Koali v Nkosi (C of A (CIV) 19 of 94) [1994] LSCA 124 (28 July 1994)
  15. Lebona v Tseole (CIV/A 21 of 88) [1994] LSCA 37 (28 February 1994)
  16. Lenka v R (CRI/APN 197 of 89) [1989] LSCA 72 (27 June 1989)
  17. Lerata & Others v Scott Hospital (C of A (CIV) No.) [2002] LSCA 85 (1 June 2002)
  18. Lerata and Others v Scott Hospital (C of A (CIV) 38 of 95) [1996] LSCA 60 (1 June 1996)
  19. Lerotholi Polytechnic and Another v Lisene (LAC/CIV 5 of 2009) [2009] LSLAC 12 (10 August 2009)
  20. Lesotho Union OP Bank Employees v Standard Bank Limited (C of A (CIV) 13 of 1984) [1995] LSCA 25 (29 January 1995)
  21. Litsoane v Kabelo (C of A (CIV) 64 of 2014) [2015] LSCA 25 (7 August 2015)
  22. Mafeteng Property Group (Pty) Ltd v Radiopelo Maphathe (C of A No.12/2021) [2022] LSCA 6 (13 May 2022)
  23. Mahanetsa v Busstop Holdings (C of A (CIV) 40 of 2018) [2019] LSCA 23 (1 February 2019)
  24. Makhanya v Pheko (CIV/T 313 of 2011) [2012] LSHC 65 (9 November 2012)
  25. Malataliana v Director of Public Prosecutions (C of A (CRI) 4 of 20) [2020] LSCA 50 (30 October 2020)
  26. Manyokole v The Prime Minister (C of A (CIV) 15 of 2021) [2021] LSCA 9 (14 May 2021)
  27. Mapiloko v Pioneer Seed RSA (Pty) Ltd and Others (LAC/APN 8 of 8) [2009] LSLAC 2 (26 January 2009)
  28. Maputsoe Properties and Others v Mamatlakala Maphisa and Others (CIV/T 136 of 2006) [2012] LSHC 87 (2 August 2012)
  29. Masaile v Masaile (CRI/T 26 of 85) [1989] LSCA 73 (28 June 1989)
  30. Minister of Labour and Employment and Others v Ts'euoa (C of A (CIV) 1 of 2008) [2008] LSCA 5 (11 April 2008)
  31. Mofomane v Mofomane (C of A (CIV) 44 of 2018) [2019] LSCA 8 (31 May 2019)
  32. Mohale v Mahao (C of A (CIV) 22 of 2004) [2005] LSCA 10 (20 April 2005)
  33. Mohaleroe Sello & CO v Mphanya (C of A (CIV) 35 of 1995) [1996] LSCA 9 (19 January 1996)
  34. Moliko and Another v Director of Public Prosecutions (CRI/REV 10 of 2013) [2014] LSHC 75 (29 April 2014)
  35. Molise v Rex (C of A (CRI) 5 of 14) [2019] LSCA 59 (1 November 2019)
  36. Motoko and 4 others V The Prime Minister of Lesotho (CIV/APN/0055B/2023) [2023] LSHC 251 (29 December 2023)
  37. Ntoetsi Tau-Tona v 'Maphoka Ramoea & 3 Ors (C OF A (CIV) 23/2023) [2023] LSCA 12 (17 November 2023)
  38. Putscane v Lekatsu (C of A (CIV) 16 of 1990) [1991] LSCA 2 (26 July 1991)
  39. Putscane v Lekatsu (C of A (CIV) 16 of 1990) [1991] LSCA 90 (26 July 1991)
  40. R v Lebina & Another (7 of 2001) [2002] LSCA 134 (11 October 2002)
  41. R v Paseka (C of A (CRI) 11 of 2005) [2006] LSCA 5 (11 April 2006)
  42. R v Sopeng (CRI/APN 58 of 83) [1983] LSCA 120 (16 December 1983)
  43. Rakometsi v Rakometsi (C of A (CIV) 27 of 5) [2006] LSCA 23 (20 October 2006)
  44. Rex v Phantši (C of A (CRI-RESERVE) 1 of 2021) [2021] LSCA 6 (14 May 2021)
  45. Surties Investment v Ministry of Health (CCT 122 of 2013) [2017] LSHC 15 (28 September 2017)
Legislation 1
  1. Court of Appeal Rules, 2006