Application for rescission – The Respondent having been dismissed from work by the 1st Applicant – The 1st Applicant having been the Principal Secretary of the 3rd Applicant – The 4th Applicant having been the lawful representative of the Applicants – The Respondent having instituted an application for review against her dismissal on the ground of having been irregularly conducted – The Applicants having not answered the application but proposed a settlement – The Applicants having not appeared before Court on the date scheduled for submission of the deed of settlement – The proposed deed of settlement not having brought before Court – The time for filing answering affidavit having been elapsed – The Court having granted the application as prayed for in the Notice of Motion – The Applicants having consequently instituted the present application for rescission through a counsel working for the 3rd Applicant.
- The counsel for the Applicants have no authority to represent them since his letter of appointment refers to a different case from the one before Court;
- The Applicants failed to establish the elements for the application for rescission;
- The application for rescission is dismissed with costs at an attorney and client scale.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF LESOTHO
HELD AT MASERU CIV/APN/208/2019
In the matter between:
P.S MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT 1ST APPLICANT
MAKHOABANE LEDIMO – N.O.
(CHAIRPERSON OF HEARING) 2ND APPLICANT
MINISTRY OF LABOUR & EMPLOYMENT 3RD APPLICANT