The Liquidator Lesotho Bank v Seleso (CIV/T 58 of 2002) [2012] LSHC 59 (20 September 2012)

SUMMARY Application for rescission of an order dismissing a rescission application for want of prosecution – Application opposed – Urgency not established but 1st respondent acquiesced to the urgency – Despite lack of urgency court exercised discretion to deal with merits – Grounds for rescission under Rule 45(1)(a) not established – Counsel lacking authority to institute or oppose application (obiter dictum)– Application dismissed- Each party to bear its own costs.